Has anybody written a paper, or a list, or a set of notes that respond to the following question, yet? " Since secure-systems are a minority of installed systems, and the LSM code works exceptionally well with a common-patch, why should this patch enter into the "official" code tree for Linux and not simply track it as a shared resource for secure-system developers, developed outside the 'stock kernel' tree? " Risking My Unpopularity To Ask a Question Early, That Will CERTAINLY Be Asked Eventually, Hopefully to get some REALLY GOOD REASONS (RGR's), J. Melvin Jones P.S. -- I'm an easily beaten "gat-fly". :) |>------------------------------------------------------ || J. MELVIN JONES jmjonesat_private |>------------------------------------------------------ || Microcomputer Systems Consultant || Software Developer || Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration || Network and Systems Administration |>------------------------------------------------------ || http://www.jmjones.com/ |>------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Mar 22 2002 - 12:47:55 PST