Re: suser/fsuser checks

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Tue Apr 09 2002 - 18:20:36 PDT

  • Next message: Lachlan McIlroy: "Re: suser/fsuser checks"

    * Lachlan McIlroy (lachlanat_private) wrote:
    > 
    > Thanks for the info Chris, I'll have a look around for
    > those patches and see what they do.  Ultimately, I would
    > like to see all calls to suser() replaced with calls to
    > capable().
    
    Here is the last patch I've seen:
    
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=101125573300001&r=1&w=2
    
    I agree, they should all be replaced.
    
    cheers,
    -chris
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 09 2002 - 18:22:23 PDT