Re: suser/fsuser checks

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: suser/fsuser checks"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: suser/fsuser checks"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: suser/fsuser checks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

lachlanat_private

Chris Wright wrote:

> * Lachlan McIlroy (lachlanat_private) wrote:
> 
>>Thanks for the info Chris, I'll have a look around for
>>those patches and see what they do.  Ultimately, I would
>>like to see all calls to suser() replaced with calls to
>>capable().
>>
> 
> Here is the last patch I've seen:
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=101125573300001&r=1&w=2
> 
> I agree, they should all be replaced.
> 
> cheers,
> -chris
> 
> 
> 

I found the same patch, unfortunately the author has left
the job of removing the calls to suser() to the maintainers
of the individual drivers.

-- 
Lachlan McIlroy

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module