* Stephen Smalley (sdsat_private) wrote: > On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Chris Wright wrote: > > 3) This is a filesystem, remove the nfsservctl hook since we have the > > standard filesystem hooks. This conceptually preserves our current stance > > which tries to avoid placing filesystem specific hooks. And reading > > the data passed in the buffers during a file write seems a bit strange. > > Labelling via standard post_lookup is a little tough, since currently > > this is an in kernel fs and it manually populates the dcache. > > This option appears to be the most consistent with LSM, as you noted. The > first option would just be a short term solution, encouraging module > writers to rely on support that will soon vanish. The second option is > too invasive, as you also noted. Sounds good, I'll remove it. And with that I can get a 2.5.7 snapshot released ;-) thanks, -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 12 2002 - 10:19:42 PDT