Chris wrote: >* Niki Rahimi (narahimiat_private) wrote: >> >> >> Yeah. I think that'll probably be the best way. I was using bprm->file->.. >> etc, to get the parent file name for sys_newstat within the >> binprm_set_security function. It will have to change the TPE structure as a >> result (I'll have to add a "few" more calls), so I was just hoping to find >> that short cut. Just being a lazy programmer. :-) >Heh, from my perspective (not knowing your code) going straight to the >inode _is_ easier. ;-) You're probably right. I'll just have to rethink and retype. What a chore. :-) >> Thanks so much for all your help. I'll let you all know how it comes along. >No problem. I look forward to hearing how it goes. If you're interested, >we can put it in the tree when it's ready for more eyes. >thanks, >-chris That would be terrific. I'll send it on to you all when I'm "done". Thanks! Niki _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jun 06 2002 - 09:08:35 PDT