Re: XFS and LSM

Previous message: richard offer: "Re: XFS and LSM"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: XFS and LSM"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: XFS and LSM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 09:13:37AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:40:11PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:58, richard offer wrote:
> > >
> > > The official IA64 syscall number for sys_security will be 1233, as assigned
> > > by David Mosberger on May 28 in response to an email I sent him.
> > 
> > OK, could we have another release incorporating the correct number in the 
> > near future?
> 
> Which patch (and against which kernel) do you see the older syscall
> number in?  In the latest 2.5 tree, it's using the proper number.

Sorry, in the 2.4 lsm tree we were using an "unofficial" number.  I've
now changed it to use the assigned number.  Any new 2.4 lsm patch will
reflect this change.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module