* Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:20:59PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > > > Greg, your change is not the same as Richard's, so I've pulled in his > > change as well. Now, both the 2.4 trees and the 2.5 tree should contain > > consistent IA-64 __NR_security macros and the proper sys_security slot > > in the syscall tables. > > Ah, sorry, didn't realize that they were different at first reading > (that's one reason sending raw bk changesets isn't a good idea :) Indeed ;-) > thanks for picking this up. No problem. Glad to see this type of change. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 12:43:24 PDT