On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:20:59PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > Greg, your change is not the same as Richard's, so I've pulled in his > change as well. Now, both the 2.4 trees and the 2.5 tree should contain > consistent IA-64 __NR_security macros and the proper sys_security slot > in the syscall tables. Ah, sorry, didn't realize that they were different at first reading (that's one reason sending raw bk changesets isn't a good idea :) thanks for picking this up. greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 12:30:39 PDT