Re: Module Identifier

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Tue Jul 02 2002 - 10:27:37 PDT

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] hook flattening for 2.4"

    * David Wheeler (dwheelerat_private) wrote:
    > 
    > I think we should do whatever most people who use the convention
    > want to do.  Anyone care one way or another?
    > I'd be happy to change it back to using "-n"; it seems to me that
    > the important thing is to agree on a convention, that's all.
    
    It's fine the way it is.
    
    thanks,
    -chris
    -- 
    Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 10:29:05 PDT