On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Greg KH wrote: > > Also, we haven't had a request yet to make the network stuff separately > > configurable (a 0.3% hit on raw gigabit TCP bandwidth may be less of an > > issue than macroizing the code). > > Linus did make that request to me after the KS presentation. But that > was due to the report of 10% hit on gigabit, which we all now know was > incorrect. I think we do have an issue with the remaining (after removal of netfilter hooks) 1-2% hit on Webstone, but we really don't know how much of this is caused by the rest of the network hooks. When LSM is split up into separate patches, it may be useful to re-run these benchmarks without any network hooks at all to see what happens to these figures. Btw, are we able to release the raw benchmark data & configuration at this stage?. - James -- James Morris <jmorrisat_private> _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 11 2002 - 20:48:51 PDT