Re: [patch] LSM base + task/binprm changes (Was: Re: Submitting LSM)

Previous message: James Morris: "Re: [patch] LSM base + task/binprm changes (Was: Re: Submitting LSM)"
In reply to: James Morris: "Re: [patch] LSM base + task/binprm changes (Was: Re: Submitting LSM)"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [patch] LSM base + task/binprm changes (Was: Re: Submitting LSM)"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: Submitting LSM (Was: Re: OLS Bof info)"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: [patch] LSM base + task/binprm changes (Was: Re: Submitting LSM)"
Reply: Greg KH: "Re: [patch] LSM base + task/binprm changes (Was: Re: Submitting LSM)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sdsat_private

On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, James Morris wrote:

> Agreed -- this looks like a good way to start.

Ok.  Perhaps someone should create a new 2.5 BitKeeper tree hosted at
bkbits.net and start merging the non-LSM IPC patch and this patch
(possibly further broken down into multiple ChangeSets) into it?

--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalleyat_private

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module