Re: [patch] LSM base + task/binprm changes (Was: Re: Submitting LSM)

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [patch] LSM base + task/binprm changes (Was: Re: Submitting LSM)"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [patch] LSM base + task/binprm changes (Was: Re: Submitting LSM)"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [patch] LSM base + task/binprm changes (Was: Re: Submitting LSM)"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: Submitting LSM (Was: Re: OLS Bof info)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:02:38PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, James Morris wrote:
> 
> > Agreed -- this looks like a good way to start.
> 
> Ok.  Perhaps someone should create a new 2.5 BitKeeper tree hosted at
> bkbits.net and start merging the non-LSM IPC patch and this patch
> (possibly further broken down into multiple ChangeSets) into it?

I'll do that, once I get the previous LSM patches I sent to Linus into
the main tree.

Keeping a tree with a bunch of patches that do not get merged with Linus
right away, based off of his tree can make for a huge mess after a
while, it just isn't worth it.  See my usb "gadget" tree at:
	bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/usbd-2.5
for an example of this nightmare :)

So in short, one step at a time...

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module