* Robb Romans (robbat_private) wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Chris Wright wrote: > > > * Robb Romans (robbat_private) wrote: > > > > > > The CAP_SYS_TIME capability denies any change to system time. We need to > > > be able to prevent decrementing the system time, but allow increment. This > > > follows the *BSD implementation of secure levels. > > > > Robb, I went to apply this patch and got a malformed patch error at line > > 188 in the patch. It's late and I'm not sure what broke. Mind re-diffing > > and re-sending? > > Attached is a newly generated patch against the latest pull from lsm-2.5. Thanks, applied. > This applies cleanly for me, but I would like to see the specific command > you are using to apply this to the main tree. Depends, often it's just patch since it gives me most control. > This may be OT, but I could use some advice on the best way to generate > diffs to send to the list. My setup is as follows: > bk://lsm.bkbits.net/lsm-2.5 =clone=> lsm-2.5 =clone=> lsm-2.5-robb. I have > been using "bk treediff lsm-2.5 lsm-2.5-robb" to generate diffs. Is there > a better way? You can also do bk diffs on each file (or against the whole repo if things aren't checked in). Or simply bk export -tpatch (picking the revs to be the diff between your tree and the base tree. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 25 2002 - 13:01:45 PDT