Re: bk error (OT)

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Wed Sep 04 2002 - 12:17:14 PDT

  • Next message: Robb Romans: "Re: bk error (OT)"

    * Robb Romans (robbat_private) wrote:
    > Anyone have a clue what this means:
    
    Looks like the patch it pulled was corrupted or not properly written to
    local disk (in PENDING/).  Does the error persist?  Perhaps upgrading your
    BK binaries.  It worked for me on three machines (using two different
    versions of BK).
    
    $ bk version
    BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.0.4 20011108052134 for x86-glibc22-linux
    Built by: rootat_private
    Built on: Tue Nov 27 23:32:26 PST 2001
    
    and 
    
    $ bk version
    BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.1.6-pre5 20020330075529 for
    x86-glibc22-linux
    Built by: lmat_private in /build/bk-2.1.x-lm/src
    Built on: Sat Mar 30 00:14:45 PST 2002
    
    cheers,
    -chris
    -- 
    Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 04 2002 - 12:22:24 PDT