Re: [patch] Hook in do_kern_mount

Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [patch] inode_init hook"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: [patch] Hook in do_kern_mount"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [patch] Hook in do_kern_mount"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [patch] Hook in do_kern_mount"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hallynat_private

> Hm, looks like DTE uses both of these hooks.  Serge, any chance of
> moving these to this new hook?

I think that would be fine for DTE.  After all, I want DTE to see
through any remounts/loopbacks.

But I think it would be moving further away from what Al Viro wants.
Every instance of do_loopback, do_move_mount, and do_remount is
ignored.  Wouldn't it be more 'correct' (or at least pc) to move the
graft_tree hooks into attach_mnt?  Would that be sufficient in place
of sb_kern_mount?

-serge
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module