On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 08:09:50AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > > Also is there a _real_ need to pass in all the arguments? > > Define _real_. It is true that none of the existing open source security > modules presently use this particular hook. SELinux doesn't presently use > it, but it seems reasonable to support finer-grained control over ioperm() > than the all-or-nothing CAP_SYS_RAWIO. Is the criteria that every hook > and every parameter to every hook must be used by an existing open source > security module? If so, then yes, this hook can be dropped. Yes, I think that is the criteria for any security hook. So it (and others) should be dropped. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 09:36:24 PDT