Stephen Smalley wrote: > Please see my response to Christoph on this issue, copied to the list. If > the criteria is that every hook and every parameter to every hook must be > used by an existing open source security module, then a number of the > hooks and parameters need to be pruned. But I don't think that this is a > good strategy, as it guarantees that the LSM hooks will need to be > extended very frequently as people begin to truly take advantage of LSM. I agree with Stephen 100%. If the LSM is going to have value it oughtn't be maintained strictly to the requirements of any specific modules. -- Casey Schaufler Manager, Trust Technology, SGI caseyat_private voice: 650.933.1634 casey_pat_private Pager: 877.557.3184 _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 09:44:23 PDT