Re: [RFC] LSM changes for 2.5.38

From: Christoph Hellwig (hchat_private)
Date: Fri Sep 27 2002 - 09:48:49 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] No more module_* hooks"

    On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:51:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
    > > leave the capable in and say it's enough or you add your random hook
    > > and remove that one.  Just adding more and more hooks without thinking
    > > gets us exactly nowhere except to an unmaintainable codebase.
    > 
    > capable is needed to be checked, as we are not modifying the existing
    > permission logic.
    
    I odn't think it makes sense to have two security checks that both
    end up in the LSM code after each other..
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 09:50:04 PDT