On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:51:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > leave the capable in and say it's enough or you add your random hook > > and remove that one. Just adding more and more hooks without thinking > > gets us exactly nowhere except to an unmaintainable codebase. > > capable is needed to be checked, as we are not modifying the existing > permission logic. I odn't think it makes sense to have two security checks that both end up in the LSM code after each other.. _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 09:50:04 PDT