Re: [RFC] No more module_* hooks

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Mon Sep 30 2002 - 09:44:02 PDT

  • Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH] accessfs v0.6 ported to 2.5.35-lsm1 - 1/2"

    * Stephen Smalley (sdsat_private) wrote:
    > 
    > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Chris Wright wrote:
    > 
    > > This seems more than reasonable, but I believe we should consider
    > > collapsing capable() hooks into existing LSM hooks rather than the other
    > > way around.  How's that sound?
    > 
    > As long as we limit the scope of such collapsing to simple capable()
    > checks, and don't start trying to collapse complex access checks with
    > embedded capable() checks within them into the LSM hooks...
    
    Yup, I agree.
    -chris
    -- 
    Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 09:52:34 PDT