Re: Early initialization of security modules

Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] No more module_* hooks"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: Early initialization of security modules"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Early initialization of security modules"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Early initialization of security modules"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: Early initialization of security modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:39:50AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> 
> I think it could be useful.  This is not well-abstracted, but IIRC it
> works fine when last tested.

Why not just use the existing _initcall levels instead of creating a new
one?  Isn't one of them early enough for security modules to use?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module