Re: [RFC] No more module_* hooks

Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Early initialization of security modules"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] No more module_* hooks"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] No more module_* hooks"
Next in thread: Casey Schaufler: "Re: [RFC] No more module_* hooks"
Reply: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] No more module_* hooks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 01:14:35AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > 
> > This seems more than reasonable, but I believe we should consider
> > collapsing capable() hooks into existing LSM hooks rather than the other
> > way around.  How's that sound?
> 
> Ok, that's reasonable to me, have a patch?  :)

Heh, not right now...I can spin up some examples later today.  Do you
have an audit list of the unused hooks?  The two together would be useful.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module