Re: [PATCH] allocation priority parameter for skb_alloc_security()

Previous message: James Morris: "Re: [PATCH] allocation priority parameter for skb_alloc_security()"
In reply to: James Morris: "[PATCH] allocation priority parameter for skb_alloc_security()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sdsat_private

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, James Morris wrote:

> -	int (*skb_alloc_security) (struct sk_buff * skb);
> +	int (*skb_alloc_security) (struct sk_buff * skbm int priority);

Looks like a typo above (m -> ,).  Otherwise, the patch looks fine to me.
As a side note, I need to make the corresponding change to the SELinux
sock_alloc_security function, which for some reason was never extended to
take the priority from the selinux_socket_sock_alloc_security hook.

--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalleyat_private

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module