On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Chris Wright wrote: > Hmm, this is an ugly one. Primarily because it touches into the fs > specific code. I don't see a good way to do this any differently aside > from introducing a wrapper like f_release that just conditionally calls > f->release and ->file_free_security... Yes, that would be straightforward. Maybe a put_private_file function in fs/file_table.c that makes these two calls, analagous to fput? > BTW, you missed the DTE instance of init_private_file. Shouldn't matter, since DTE doesn't allocate or use a security field for file structures, and it can't be stacked with SELinux. -- Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs ssmalleyat_private _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 10:40:51 PST