On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:34:30AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 10:24:31PM -0800, Tim Potter wrote: > > I looked through fork.c and it looked like this was the case but I > > wasn't very sure. Unfortunately it looks like in this case the parent > > of current is also pointing to the grandfather. )-: > > You wouldn't want to look at current->p_ppt; you'd want to treat current > itself as the parent. (Unless the clone(2) flag CLONE_PARENT has been D'oh. Of course - I took "dereference" to mean look at p_pptr. When I look at current it gives me the correct information. Thanks, Tim. _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Nov 17 2002 - 17:19:57 PST