On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 06:06:47PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:03:58AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:00:02PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:35:42AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > ChangeSet 1.797.142.4, 2002/12/04 16:56:51-06:00, gregat_private > > > > > > > > LSM: add the example rootplug module > > > > > > I don't think that's the kind of module that should be merged.. > > > > Why? We have other "example" drivers in the kernel tree. This is just > > like that. > > because it a) implements silly policy That was the point :) And I've seen sillier in "real" security products too... > and b) violates layer rules. What do you mean by this? The fact that it abuses the USB core? If so, yes I agree with you, so I should probably move the "is this USB device present" functionality into the USB core for everyone to use. Would that be better? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 05 2002 - 10:14:34 PST