On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 07:04:15PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > > At the moment the very existance of the sys_security() call is under debate so > there's probably no point in submitting a change upstream, but I think it > would be good for development purposes if we had a syscall defined for all > architectures in the LSM patch. There's no more debate, the syscall is dead. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Dec 07 2002 - 11:20:28 PST