Re: Willing to change LSM so secondary defaults correct

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Fri Dec 27 2002 - 15:54:42 PST

  • Next message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Willing to change LSM so secondary defaults correct"

    On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 03:51:19PM -0800, Crispin Cowan wrote:
    > That's interesting. There is a need for a good, standard, open source 
    > system macrobenchmark. Lots of people (WireX included) use various forms 
    > of "build the kernel from source" as a benchmark, but because the kernel 
    > changes, the benchmark is only useful for relative comparisons, i.e. I 
    > can use it to show that the Foo feature imposes 4% overhead, but you 
    > can't go off and run another benchmark to compare your results to mine. 
    > So it is a very good thing that someone is working to standardize it.
    
    Sorry, contest is only a "relative" benchmark, not an absolute one.
    
    greg k-h
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Dec 27 2002 - 18:17:19 PST