Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59

From: Mark Hahn (hahnat_private)
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 08:26:34 PST

  • Next message: Stephen D. Smalley: "Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59"

    > No.  If one were to add such a field, then it would be accessible
    > through the ctl_table structure that is already passed to the hook.
    > You would not replace the ctl_table parameter with the kernel's
    > sensitivity hint, since the security module must be able to make its
    
    can all this LSM nonsese be CONFIG'ed out of the kernel as promised?
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Feb 05 2003 - 08:28:47 PST