'Christoph Hellwig' wrote: >Yes. If we want so support security models more complicated than plain >UNIX DAC (an especially more than one of those) there's no way around >moving all access control out of the core kernel. That's not right (and we have existence proofs that one can implement other security policies using the current LSM). There are good reasons for moving all access control out of the kernel, but let's not overstate them. >The other point I'm extremly unhappy with >adding them without adding it's users. Can you elaborate? I'd be interested to hear why. (This is not a criticism; I'm just trying to understand your objections.) _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Feb 10 2003 - 08:59:01 PST