Pete Zaitcev wrote: >I used to be super irritated by separate lists. Now I'm a member >of linux-usb-devel, uml-devel, sparclinux, and god knows what else. >Yes, they are unavoidable. Still, it is important to keep linux-kernel >at least somewhat informed. IMHO. > LKML was kept at least somewhat informed, IMHO: * LSM announced April 11, 2001 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98695004126478&w=4> * Should there be separate lists for module development? <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98695659813419&w=4> o Probably <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98701977623500&w=4> * Discussion of the "DAC-out" design option appears in LKML July 12, 2001 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=99497020101496&w=4> * LSM entangled in discussion of whether binary-only modules should be permitted, September 24, 2001 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100134989121896&w=4> * Syscall 223 provisionally reserved for LSM <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100255709403906&w=4> * LSM mentioned as related to extended attributes project <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100509197600341&w=4> * Does LSM conflict with accessfs? January 16, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101120760212957&w=4> o No, it does not <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101138310816232&w=4> * LSM in Guillaume's big list of 2.5 stuff, January 23, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101176727007672&w=4> * LSM in Marc-Christian Petersen's forked kernel, May 21, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102201919806027&w=4> * LSM interfacing to extended attributes, June 28, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102527059400830&w=4> * First LSM patch into Linus' tree, July 16, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102677797911383&w=4> o There are lots of these subsequently, so I won't cite them all * Racing with module load/unload affects LSM too, September 12, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103181033207587&w=4> * HCH takes issue with LSM, September 26, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103307580006067&w=4> * LSM hook style changes from low-cost hooks to no-cost configurable hooks, October 16, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103472694817532&w=4> * LSM and GPL requirement for modules, October 17, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103486544115996&w=4> * Remove the LSM sys_security call, October 17, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103488104604175&w=4> * LSM changed so that module does not have to provision every hook by providing a default action, December 1, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103872797618899&w=4> * The start of this flame-war, February 5, 2002 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=104441899708408&w=4> Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Scientist, WireX http://wirex.com/~crispin/ Recruiting for Linux kernel and glibc developers: http://immunix.org/jobs.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Feb 12 2003 - 22:53:17 PST