* Christoph Hellwig (hchat_private) wrote: > > And that for examples is a very important and needed change. Security > modules as loadable modules are a bad idea as you don't have a consistand > labelling state - just look at the older selinux versions with all the > precondition mess. But it should be generalized to a new initcall level > instead of the current explicit call to the selinux routine.. I wrote such a patch last summer. I'll rebase it to current and post it (most likely when i return from .se). It needs to be separte from normal initcalls since they all happen too late. -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Feb 13 2003 - 03:10:53 PST