Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups

• Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Chris Wright <chrisat_private> wrote:
>
> security_capable() returns 0 if that capability bit is set. 

That's just bizarre.  Is there any logic behind it?


_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module

• Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 03:44:56 PDT