Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups

Previous message: Chris Friesen: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Andrew Morton (akpmat_private) wrote:
> Chris Wright <chrisat_private> wrote:
> >
> > security_capable() returns 0 if that capability bit is set. 
> 
> That's just bizarre.  Is there any logic behind it?

Yes, as Stephen pointed out, it's common for the security interface to
return 0 on success on -errno on failure.

cheers,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module