Re: owlsm - missing in action?

Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "owlsm - missing in action?"
In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "owlsm - missing in action?"
Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: owlsm - missing in action?"
Reply: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: owlsm - missing in action?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Valdis.Kletnieksat_private (Valdis.Kletnieksat_private) wrote:
> which seems to be the latest diff I can find?  Or do I have to
> bite the bullet and install BitKeeper?

This is certainly the consistent way to get the latest.

> Alternatively, could somebody turn the crank and make a 2.5.70-lsm1 patch?

I'll push out the 2.5.70 patch.  Some of the modules may not be building
ATM.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module