Re: owlsm - missing in action?

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Mon Jun 02 2003 - 10:43:38 PDT

  • Next message: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: owlsm - missing in action?"

    * Valdis.Kletnieksat_private (Valdis.Kletnieksat_private) wrote:
    > which seems to be the latest diff I can find?  Or do I have to
    > bite the bullet and install BitKeeper?
    
    This is certainly the consistent way to get the latest.
    
    > Alternatively, could somebody turn the crank and make a 2.5.70-lsm1 patch?
    
    I'll push out the 2.5.70 patch.  Some of the modules may not be building
    ATM.
    
    thanks,
    -chris
    -- 
    Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 10:47:24 PDT