Re: owlsm - missing in action?

From: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private
Date: Mon Jun 02 2003 - 12:28:41 PDT

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "2.5.70-lsm1"

    On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 10:43:38 PDT, Chris Wright said:
    > * Valdis.Kletnieksat_private (Valdis.Kletnieksat_private) wrote:
    > > which seems to be the latest diff I can find?  Or do I have to
    > > bite the bullet and install BitKeeper?
    > This is certainly the consistent way to get the latest.
    I'll have to go read the license carefully - one of the projects I'm
    working on is suspiciously close to a source code management system,
    so there may be issues.
    > I'll push out the 2.5.70 patch.  Some of the modules may not be building
    > ATM.
    I'll check and feedback..

    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 12:29:43 PDT