Chris wrote: >Here are some more TPE updates. Removing the fs code helped get rid of >some memory leaks, as well as the ability for users to specify how much >kernel memory they want allocated (IIRC), so cleanups are going well ;-) Great to hear. I like how it reduced the lines of code in the module. Less to check. :-) >This is largely CodingStyle type changes, plus a couple spots where >you'll return with the spin_lock held. Could you review these changes? Looks good. Also, I forgot to update the tpe.txt file under Documentation/lsm to reflect the sysfs approach. How would you like that patch sent? Thanks, Niki Niki A. Rahimi LTC Security Development narahimiat_private (512)838-5399 _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jun 12 2003 - 11:36:26 PDT