Re: [PATCH] TPE updates

Previous message: Niki Rahimi: "Re: [PATCH] TPE updates"
In reply to: Niki Rahimi: "Re: [PATCH] TPE updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Niki Rahimi (narahimiat_private) wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> >Here are some more TPE updates.  Removing the fs code helped get rid of
> >some memory leaks, as well as the ability for users to specify how much
> >kernel memory they want allocated (IIRC), so cleanups are going well ;-)
> 
> Great to hear. I like how it reduced the lines of code in the module. Less
> to check. :-)

Yes, nice to see the code reduction and reuse of common infrastructure.

> >This is largely CodingStyle type changes, plus a couple spots where
> >you'll return with the spin_lock held.  Could you review these changes?
> 
> Looks good. Also, I forgot to update the tpe.txt file under
> Documentation/lsm
> to reflect the sysfs approach. How would you like that patch sent?

I'll commit the patch from this thread, if you could send a diff -u
against the tpe.txt file to the list, I can add it as another patch.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module