On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 15:36, David Wheeler wrote: > I would like to see that LSM postings permitted only by subscribers. > We're getting WAY too many spam messages, and I > think it will get worse. Subscribing is a simple process - it's > a small price to pay for posting. Besides, many other lists require > subscription before posting, so this won't be an unusual requirement. > That, plus other filters, should keep things to a dull roar. I'd agree that this has become a nuisance, and it is becoming increasingly tempting to unsubscribe from lsm. It may just be a perception, but it seems like I get far more spam from lsm than lkml or other public lists to which I subscribe. Perhaps that is just because there is sufficient legitimate volume on those lists to make the signal-to-noise ratio acceptable. One might argue that aside from major new directions for LSM, any LSM-related discussions should just occur directly on lkml anyway. -- Stephen Smalley <sdsat_private> National Security Agency _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 09 2003 - 10:51:02 PDT