On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:50:10PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > It may just be a > perception, but it seems like I get far more spam from lsm than lkml or > other public lists to which I subscribe. Perhaps that is just because > there is sufficient legitimate volume on those lists to make the > signal-to-noise ratio acceptable. I think lkml has better filters and some more active list admins :) > One might argue that aside from major new directions for LSM, any > LSM-related discussions should just occur directly on lkml anyway. I agree. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:07:00 PDT