Re: Problem of attaching a security structer to sock in 2.6.4!!

From: James Morris (jmorris@private)
Date: Tue May 18 2004 - 20:29:02 PDT

Next message: Michele Belcher: "Buy Unbelievable Prices"

Previous message: Yuan Chunyang: "Re: Problem of attaching a security structer to sock in 2.6.4!!"
In reply to: Yuan Chunyang: "Re: Problem of attaching a security structer to sock in 2.6.4!!"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Problem of attaching a security structer to sock in 2.6.4!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 19 May 2004, Yuan Chunyang wrote:

> Why does mainline kernel not accept the network part of lsm in 2.6 ? For efficiency or else ?

Yes, generally, they were too invasive.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@private>

Next message: Michele Belcher: "Buy Unbelievable Prices"
Previous message: Yuan Chunyang: "Re: Problem of attaching a security structer to sock in 2.6.4!!"
In reply to: Yuan Chunyang: "Re: Problem of attaching a security structer to sock in 2.6.4!!"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Problem of attaching a security structer to sock in 2.6.4!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 18 2004 - 20:29:49 PDT