Re: Clarifications of LSM API

From: James Morris (jmorris@private)
Date: Mon Jun 28 2004 - 06:19:15 PDT

Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"

Previous message: China@private: "China Lighting Express 26th Issue of 2004"
In reply to: Andrew E. Ruder: "Clarifications of LSM API"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Reply: Tomas Olsson: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Andrew E. Ruder wrote:

> Am I way off base here or can the modules only be used to take
>  away permissions and not to add permissions from the 
> traditional unix permissions scheme?

They are 'restrictive' in that they can only reduce access, not increase
it.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@private>

Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Previous message: China@private: "China Lighting Express 26th Issue of 2004"
In reply to: Andrew E. Ruder: "Clarifications of LSM API"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Reply: Tomas Olsson: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jun 28 2004 - 06:19:45 PDT