On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Stephen Smalley wrote: > Specifically, I had suggested embedding the common header, see: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-security-module&m=99980953709764&w=2 > and > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-security-module&m=99986372711363&w=2 The optimization for a single LSM is good, but won't the common case be two LSMs (e.g. capabilities + something else) ? If so, I'd suggest having two statically allocated entries as primary & secondary, then any further LSMs can be stacked dynamically. Even then, unless a distro was planning on shipping three or more stacked LSMs by default, I'd wonder if it was really going to be useful in a wider sense. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@private>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 29 2004 - 08:50:09 PDT