Re: Clarifications of LSM API

From: Greg KH (greg@private)
Date: Wed Jun 30 2004 - 10:32:20 PDT

  • Next message: Tomas Olsson: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API" 

    On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 08:24:22AM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> James Morris wrote:
> 
> >The optimization for a single LSM is good, but won't the common case be
> >two LSMs (e.g. capabilities + something else) ?
> >
> Maybe. For us, we found it easier to incorporate the Capabilities 
> functionality into our own SubDomain module than to try to stack the 
> two. YMMV.

Cool, a SubDomain LSM module.  Have a link to the source/patch?

thanks,

greg k-h

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jun 30 2004 - 15:24:26 PDT