* Crispin Cowan (crispin@private) wrote: > I don't understand this approach at all. Was anyone here at the kernel > summit 2004? Can you comment on these questions: > > * How will development and stable kernel releases be distinguished > within 2.6? General sense is the current scheme is working very well, even with large patch rates to the stable tree. It's possible that Linus would open a dev tree for highly experimental, unstable changes. > * What kind of new LSM functionality would be considered for 2.6, if > any? Other than things to support new security modules (could be a new hook, or better stacking), not likely much. What's needed is more in-tree modules. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Aug 02 2004 - 08:41:44 PDT