* Stephen Smalley (sds@private) wrote: > On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 15:49, Chris Wright wrote: > > send_sigurg() will call check_kill_permission() which checks > > security_task_kill(), does this confuse the result at all? > > That's done with info == 1 (SEND_SIG_PRIV), so it skips checking at that > point, right? Otherwise, it would end up checking based on current > rather than the fown's credentials, which would be wrong. That's exactly what I meant by confuse (random process context). I must have misread, as I saw the check (SEND_SIG_PRIV included) calling the security_task_kill() hook. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 27 2004 - 13:03:25 PDT