* Chris Wright (chrisw@private) wrote: > * Stephen Smalley (sds@private) wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 15:49, Chris Wright wrote: > > > send_sigurg() will call check_kill_permission() which checks > > > security_task_kill(), does this confuse the result at all? > > > > That's done with info == 1 (SEND_SIG_PRIV), so it skips checking at that > > point, right? Otherwise, it would end up checking based on current > > rather than the fown's credentials, which would be wrong. > > That's exactly what I meant by confuse (random process context). I must > have misread, as I saw the check (SEND_SIG_PRIV included) calling the > security_task_kill() hook. Ah, I guess you mean in the module.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 27 2004 - 13:12:41 PDT