* Stephen Smalley (sds@private) wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen people ask about this warning several times, understandably, > as it gives the appearance that something is wrong, whereas it just > indicates that there is already a primary security module and the > requesting security module needs to fall back as a secondary (which the > capability module does). Perhaps register_security() shouldn't be > displaying error messages itself, and defer this to the caller? The > capability module correctly only displays a message if it also fails to > register as a secondary module. Not a big deal to me, but as I've seen > user questions about it, it does seem to be a source of confusion... Yeah, I've seen that as well. It'll be fixed shortly. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Oct 21 2004 - 11:07:07 PDT