Re: [RFC] [Stacking v4 1/3] New lsm chaining patch

From: Serge Hallyn (serue@private)
Date: Mon Dec 06 2004 - 14:31:48 PST


Oh, so in that case there would be no reason not to leave them as
#defines as in the previous version?

thanks,
-serge

On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:55 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 13:03, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Attached is a new version of lsm-chain.patch.  It moves
> > CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER out of security.h, changing the
> > security_get_value and friends in the case of no CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER
> > from #defines in security.h to brief static inlines in security.c.
> 
> Hmmm...not inline, if in security.c.  The prior suggestion was to move
> them from security.h to a separate header file that could be included by
> all LSMs that support stacking, so that they could still be inlined.
> 
-- 
Serge Hallyn <serue@private>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Dec 06 2004 - 13:46:46 PST