On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 09:15 -0800, Chris Wright wrote: > Yes I think we want to avoid duplication whereever possible, it's just > asking for stale code. The dummy logic wasn't using capable() > so it's not a full copy (easy to remedy). Is that the behavior we want to preserve? Or do we want to go ahead and use capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) in the dummy version? -- Serge Hallyn <serue@private>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Dec 17 2004 - 12:20:26 PST