Re: [RFC] [Stacking v4 2/3] New version of SELinux patch to support stacking

From: Serge Hallyn (serue@private)
Date: Fri Dec 17 2004 - 13:00:10 PST

On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 09:15 -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> Yes I think we want to avoid duplication whereever possible, it's just
> asking for stale code.  The dummy logic wasn't using capable()
> so it's not a full copy (easy to remedy).

Is that the behavior we want to preserve?  Or do we want to go ahead and
use capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) in the dummy version?

Serge Hallyn <serue@private>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Dec 17 2004 - 12:20:26 PST