* Serge Hallyn (serue@private) wrote: > Ok. Actually, this points out what should have been a problem before - > I guess __vm_enough_memory should be in security.c? Or actually just in > dummy.c Otherwise commoncap.c will always be required for dummy.c (and > selinux). Yes I think we want to avoid duplication whereever possible, it's just asking for stale code. The dummy logic wasn't using capable() so it's not a full copy (easy to remedy). thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Dec 17 2004 - 09:16:20 PST